This site has been migrated from Wordpress to 11ty based static site. I took the posts, categories, tags and comments as JSON data and made the necessary templates for conversion. Everything should be alot faster now.
The look is still a bit bare, and some things like tables seem a bit broken. Will address these issues hopefully during upcoming days, weeks and months. Enjoy!
PS. Comments are currently disabled, I was only receiving spam in any case. You
can check out my homepage at https://joonaspihlajamaa.com/ if you want to
contact me.
The security of sensitive information is of utmost importance today. One way to enhance the security of
stored passwords is by using PBKDF2 with SHA256 HMAC, a cryptographic algorithm that adds an extra layer of protection if the password hashes are compromised. I covered recently how to calculate PBKDF2 yourself with Python, but today needed to do the same with Javascript.
CryptoJS documentation on PBKDF2 is as scarce as everything on this library, and trying out the 256 bit key example with Node.js gives the following output:
$ node
Welcome to Node.js v19.6.0.
Type ".help" for more information.
> const crypto = require('crypto-js')
undefined
> const key = crypto.PBKDF2("password", "salt", {keySize: 256/32, iterations: 4096})
undefined
> crypto.enc.Hex.stringify(key)
'4b007901b765489abead49d926f721d065a429c12e463f6c4cd79401085b03db'
Now let's recall what Python gave here:
$ python
Python 3.10.7 (tags/v3.10.7:6cc6b13, Sep 5 2022, 14:08:36) [MSC v.1933 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import hashlib
>>> hashlib.pbkdf2_hmac('sha256', b'password', b'salt', 4096).hex()
'c5e478d59288c841aa530db6845c4c8d962893a001ce4e11a4963873aa98134a'
>>>
Uh-oh, they don't match! Now looking at pbkdf2.js in the CryptoJS Github source, we can see that the algorithm defaults to SHA-1:
Seeing how keySize and iterations are overridden, we only need to locate the SHA256 in proper namespace to guide the implementation to use SHA256 HMAC instead:
$ node
Welcome to Node.js v19.6.0.
Type ".help" for more information.
> const crypto = require('crypto-js')
undefined
> const key = crypto.PBKDF2("password", "salt", {keySize: 256/32,
... iterations: 4096, hasher: crypto.algo.SHA256})
undefined
> crypto.enc.Hex.stringify(key)
'c5e478d59288c841aa530db6845c4c8d962893a001ce4e11a4963873aa98134a'
Awesome! Now we are ready to rock'n'roll with a proper hash function.
I have to confess I have a thing for small prototyping boards, especially ones
with Bluetooth or WLAN connectivity. So when I was offered the opportunity to
get a couple of Seeed Studio's tiny Bluetooth
devboards with Nordic's
nRF52840 in them to try out, I
jumped at the opportunity. So full disclosure, I did not buy these myself, but neither did I get any compensation, so what follows will be rather unbiased first impressions! I will cover:
The basic specifications of the two units
How to (re)program the device with Arduino
Help to troubleshoot upload.tool.serial errors on Arduino
Tips and notes on using the USB mass storage mode
Initial summary
I'm interested in trying out the PDM microphone, accelerometer and BLE functionality later on, so check back for updates!
Basic specifications of the Seeed XIAO BLE nrf52840
The Seeed XIAO BLE units come in two varieties, both sharing quite beefy specs:
Bluetooth 5.0 with an onboard antenna
Nordic nRF52840, ARM Cortex-M4 32-bit processor with FPU, 64 MHz
Low power consumption and battery charging chip for untethered IoT use cases
Onboard 2 MB flash
Additionally, the Sense variant contains a PDM microphone and a 6-axis accelerometer. The units arrived from China quite quickly and came in sweet little Seeed plastic packages, pin headers included (not soldered in):
You can get both directly from Seeed, with very reasonable $9.90 and $15.99 price points. Nordic's chips are quite hard to source from AliExpress cheaply (yes I have looked :), so I'd consider both pretty much a bargain.
Board quality seems very good, pads are shiny and components well placed. The USB port is of modern USB-C variety, and the form factor is really small,
just 20 x 17.5 mm or the size of a nickel x dime. and the thickness of a half dollar or so (U.S. readers, you're welcome!). The PCB is one-sided which makes it easy to embed in various configurations.
Outside differences of the basic model and Sense variant is one additional chip that contains the PDM microphone. I think the accelerometer is hidden inside the (seemingly FCC and CE compliant) shielding.
There is also an absurdly tiny reset button on the opposite corner to the microphone pad (top left above) that is a bit tricky to press. I'd prefer a slightly larger one, but it beats shorting pins any day.
Classic blink test with Arduino
You can follow the instructions on Seeed Studio wiki to install the necessary development tools to build firmware for the device. Short version:
Compared to Arduino Uno, the RP2040 has major advantages for this project:
Much higher clock frequency of 133 MHz means there's cycles to spare even at ~1 Mhz rates
Relatively vast SRAM memory, 264 kB vs. 2 kB
Native C SDK that is rather easy to work with
I'm using the Seeed XIAO RP2040 for this project. It is extremely compact and has a nice USB-C interface. You can see the wiring, it's just 3.3V and GND to the receiver (which luckily did work fine with that voltage) and signal to GPIO pin 0.
Note that while RP2040 pinout has 5V supply line, the GPIO pins are not 5V tolerant, so you should not power a 5V receiver and directly connect it to pin 0. A voltage divider is strongly recommended to avoid longer term damage to the RP2040 pin.
Setting up RP2040 programming environment
I basically followed the Getting started guide that was linked from the Pico SDK Github to get the Blink example working. After that, it was quite simple to set up a new project following the "Quick-start your own project", setting up CMakeLists.txt like this:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.13)
# initialize the SDK based on PICO_SDK_PATH
# note: this must happen before project()
include(pico_sdk_import.cmake)
project(joonas-pico)
# initialize the Raspberry Pi Pico SDK
pico_sdk_init()
# rest of your project
add_subdirectory(logic_analyze)
$ mkdir logic_analyze
$ cd logic_analyze
$ wget https://codeandlife.com/images/2023/logic-analyze-pico.zip
$ unzip logic_analyze-pico.zip
$ mkdir build
$ cd build
$ export PICO_SDK_PATH=../../pico-sdk
$ cmake ..
$ make
Note that this assumes you placed the example directory logic_analyze alongside your pico-sdk directory.
After running make, you should find the logic.uf2 file under logic_analyze directory and you can just drag and drop it to your RP2040 when it is in USB drive mode.
C Code for Recording GPIO Changes
The code is basically combination of what I did for Arduino and Raspberry Pi, and the hello_gpio_irq and hello_timer examples. Basic logic:
Setup stdio_init_all() (over USB, necessary definitions to enable that in CMakeLists.txt file) and wait until stdio_usb_connected() returns true.
Loop forever, asking the user over serial (USB) to press a key to start recording
Clear receive buffer
Set alarm timeout of 5 seconds to end recording if buffer hasn't been filled
Set up GPIO interrupt triggers on rising and falling edges of pin 0
In the interrupt handler, record time elapsed since last edge using time_us_64()
Once timeout is reached or buffer has been filled, disable GPIO interrupt and print out received timings.
Here's the main method:
int main() {
stdio_init_all();
while(!stdio_usb_connected());
while(true) {
printf("Press any key to start.\n");
getchar_timeout_us(100*1000000);
printf("Started!\n");
for(int i = 0; i < BUFSIZE; i++) buf[i] = 0; // Clear
pos = 0;
timer_fired = false;
add_alarm_in_ms(5000, alarm_callback, NULL, false);
gpio_set_irq_enabled_with_callback(0,
GPIO_IRQ_EDGE_RISE | GPIO_IRQ_EDGE_FALL,
true, &gpio_callback);
while(!timer_fired && pos <= BUFSIZE) tight_loop_contents();
gpio_set_irq_enabled(0, GPIO_IRQ_EDGE_RISE | GPIO_IRQ_EDGE_FALL, false);
printf("Ended.\n");
for(int i = 0; i < pos; i++) printEdge(buf[i], i&1);
}
}
Alarm and interrupt callbacks are rather straightforward:
A quick one tonight. Having just spent enjoyable hacking time to reverse engineer Chris Veness' AES 256 encryption library enough to be able to decrypt some old data I had using CryptoJS, I thought I will share it with the world to enjoy.
Now Chris' library is nice and simple, you can just encrypt stuff with AES 256 counter mode with a single line of code:
> AESEncryptCtr('Well this is fun!', 'password', 256)
'SdzeY4GBgYHDEWay4JdHr/CnwwnAoBfjQA=='
Now AES 256 is a super standard cipher, so it should be pretty easy to decrypt that with another libray, right?
WRONG!
Wrong, standard AES crypto is not always easy to decrypt
Turns out that Chris' library does not use the 'password' in a way most other libraries use it, but instead chooses to:
Decode the string into UTF8
Create a 16 byte array and put the decoded string into beginning of the array
Initialize AES encryption ("key expansion") using this array
Encrypt a copy of the array as a single AES block using the key expansion (that the library has internally just been initialized with)
Expand the AES encrypted 16 bytes by doubling the array into 32 byte one
Use the 32 byte array as the AES key
Now if you think that any other library would use the same method, you would be dead wrong. Also, most libraries do not expose the same set of functions to replicate this process in any simple manner.
To add insult to injury, JavaScript has so poor support for byte data that it seems each crypto library uses its own internal representation of binary data. For example, CryptoJS likes to make a uint32 array, so [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] is represented as {words: [0x01020304, 0x05060708], sigBytes: 8}!
Thankfully, yours truly is a true master and after just 2 hours of trial and error, I managed to produce this golden nugget:
const crypto = require('crypto-js');
function VanessKey(password) {
const iv = { words: [0,0,0,0], sigBytes: 16};
const encrypted = crypto.AES.encrypt(
crypto.enc.Utf8.parse(password.padEnd(16, '\0')),
crypto.enc.Utf8.parse(password.padEnd(32, '\0')), { iv }
).ciphertext;
const ew = encrypted.words.slice(0, 4);
// double the first 4 words of the encrypted
encrypted.words = ew.concat(ew);
return encrypted;
}
const key = VanessKey('password');
console.log(key);
console.log(crypto.enc.Hex.stringify(key));
Saving it as decrypt.cjs and running node decrypt.cjs should produce the "Vaness key" for 'password':
Now we only need the magic incantation to decrypt the Base64 encoded data SdzeY4GBgYHDEWay4JdHr/CnwwnAoBfjQA== produced in the intro! This is also pretty non-straightforward:
Finale time! After analyzing the Nexa 433 MHz smart power plug remote control signal with Arduino Uno
and regular USB soundcard, it is time to try some heavier guns: Raspberry Pi 4 and
PicoScope 2208B MSO.
I was initially sceptical on using a Raspberry Pi for analyzing signals, due to several reasons:
Most GPIO projects on RaspPi seem to use Python, which is definitely not a low-latency solution, especially compared to raw C.
Having done a raw C GPIO benchmark on RaspPi in the past, the libraries were indeed quite... low level.
I had serious doubts that a multitasking operating system like Linux running on the side of time-critical signal measurements might impact performance (it is not a RTOS after all).
However, there are projects like rpi-rf that seem to work, so I dug in and found out some promising aspects:
There is a interrupt driven GPIO edge detection capability in the RaspPi.GPIO library that should trigger immediately on level changes.
Python has a sub-microsecond precision time.perf_counter_ns() that is suitable for recording the time of the interrupt
Python code to record GPIO signals in Raspberry Pi
While rpi-rf did not work properly with my Nexa remote, taking hints from the implementation allowed me to write pretty concise Python script to capture GPIO signals:
from RPi import GPIO
import time, argparse
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Analyze RF signal for Nexa codes')
parser.add_argument('-g', dest='gpio', type=int, default=27, help='GPIO pin (Default: 27)')
parser.add_argument('-s', dest='secs', type=int, default=3, help='Seconds to record (Default: 3)')
parser.add_argument('--raw', dest='raw', action='store_true', default=False, help='Output raw samples')
args = parser.parse_args()
times = []
GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM)
GPIO.setup(args.gpio, GPIO.IN)
GPIO.add_event_detect(args.gpio, GPIO.BOTH,
callback=lambda ch: times.append(time.perf_counter_ns()//1000))
time.sleep(args.secs)
GPIO.remove_event_detect(args.gpio)
GPIO.cleanup()
# Calculate difference between consecutive times
diff = [b-a for a,b in zip(times, times[1:])]
if args.raw: # Print a raw dump
for d in diff: print(d, end='\n' if d>5e3 else ' ')
The code basically parses command line arguments (defaulting to GPIO pin 27 for input) and sets up GPIO.add_event_detect() to record (microsecond) timings of the edge changes on the pin. In the end, differences between consecutive times will be calculated to yield edge lengths instead of timings.
Raspberry Pi is nice also due to the fact that it has 3.3V voltage available on GPIO. Wiring up the 433 MHz receiver was a pretty elegant matter (again, there is a straight jumper connection between GND and last pin of the receiver):
Wire the receiver in
Start the script with python scan.py --raw (use -h option instead for help on command)
Press the Nexa remote button 1 during the 3 second recording interval
Here's how the output looks like (newline is added after delays longer than 5 ms):